(This blog is under construction.)

(There are no “right” answers in science — only the ability to deduce better questions.)

But let me present the scientific “second-opinion”.  Here is Christine’s “Myopia Primer”.

If you scan down — you will see the dynamic natural eye in action.  The FUNDAMENTAL eye responds to both a -3 and +3 diopter lens as shown in the “blue tint” annimation.

http://vision.berkeley.edu/wildsoet/myopiaprimer.html

There is no longer any question about this.  The implication is that a negative state of the natural eye — could be prevented, i.e., the natural eye will change its “state” in a postive direction — if a plus is used correctly.

The “blue-tint” concept of the NATURAL or FUNDAMENTAL eye would be “imagination” as science — if it were not backed-up by objective measurements.  The point is this — these measurements are absolutely OBJECTIVE AS SCIENCE.  These results (for the NATURAL or FUNDAMENTAL EYE) can be repeated IN ANY COMPETENT SCIENTIFIC STUDY.  Here is the data itself.

http://myopiafree.i-see.org/FundEye.html

To me, this RESOLVES the issue of science and the use of the plus (under control of the person himself).  Prevention will “work” — if the person himself is WISE ENOUGH to “work prevention”.